Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NOREF] add support for queryParams and scheme #354

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Smeb
Copy link
Contributor

@Smeb Smeb commented Sep 29, 2023

No description provided.

// The rule will not match if only a subsequence of the string matches the regex.
// https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/api-v3/config/route/v3/route_components.proto#envoy-v3-api-field-config-route-v3-routematch-safe-regex
r, err := regexp.Compile("^" + sm.GetRegex() + "$")
if err != nil {
return false, fmt.Errorf("could not compile regex %s: %v", sm.GetRegex(), err)
}
return r.MatchString(s), nil
default:
return false, fmt.Errorf("unknown matcher type %T", sm.GetMatchType())
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Returning an error here is a behaviour change - could also be a log

URI string
Headers map[string]string
Scheme string
QueryParams map[string]string
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need a separate field for the parameters or can we use the uri and parse from it?

Also, the same parameter can be set multiple times and interpreted differently by web frameworks as there is no apparent standard, this would be another reason not to use map[string]string

https://go.dev/play/p/dcExJ0RlFYT

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed will keep as is for now - the envoy behaviour is to check the first query param

@Smeb Smeb closed this Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants